“You are an ignorant!” JK Rowling is attacking Emma Watson

It clashes hard in the Wizarding World! The blurring between the writer and the original cast may well have reached a point of no return.

Expeliarmus!

JK Rowling has just thrown a brutal spell at Emma Watson on social networks. The author of Harry Potter has been blurred with the original cast for years, following its positions on the trans community, deemed transphobes by many. But this time, the attack is frontal, without filter, treating the young actress of “little ignorant who did not experience anything “.

Back back. In the early 2020s, Emma Watson joined Daniel Radcliffe and her other colleagues in the saga to publicly oppose Rowling. She said at the time: “Trans people are what they say to be and they deserve to live their lives without being constantly questioned or to whom they are said to be what they claim to be. “

This month, the quarrel has grown after an interview with Emma Watson in the podcast We purpose With Jay Shetty. The 31 -year -old star explains that she can love and cherish her experience with Rowling while disapproving of her positions: “I do not think that having lived this experience, nor the values ​​and the support that I have today (to the transgender community), prevent me from loving Jo and the person with whom I shared these moments. I will never believe that one cancels the other, and I will always cherish this experience and this relationship that I had with it”. A rather benevolent message on the substance, since she in substance does not have ashamed to have worked with the author. But on the form, JK Rowling did not appreciate this new outing at all concerning it.

In a long message published on X, she says she does not need “to wait for any validation on the part of an actor or actress who embodied one of my characters. It would be as absurd as to go and ask my boss today of my 21 years what opinions I should have. “ JK Rowling explains that Watson and Radcliffe are free to have opinions that do not correspond to his, but that it is annoyed that her former collaborators feel “forced” to criticize her publicly: “Years after finishing playing in Potterthey continue to assume, de facto, the role of spokespersons of the world I created … “

She says she was very annoyed by a little note that Emma Watson would have transmitted to her one day via an intermediary, saying to her: “I’m so sorry for what you are going through. ” The author judges all these derisory comments and considers that the actors of Harry Potter would be better to be silent. She supports:

“Like other people who have never known adulthood without the cushion of wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life that she ignores how ignorant she is! She will never need a center for homeless. She will never be placed in a mixed public hospital. bodyguard in front of the door.

JK Rowling insists in stride on her own modest origins, she who suffered for a long time from poverty, before Harry Potter was discovered:

“”I was not a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty when I wrote the book that was going to make Emma Watson famous. I therefore understand, by my own experience, what it means for women and girls without its privileges the destruction of their rights, in which Emma participated with so much enthusiasm. The biggest paradox here is that if Emma had not decided in her recent interview to declare that she loved me and cherish me-a turnaround that I suspect dictated by the fact that she noticed that the total conviction of my person is a little less fashionable than before-I might never have been so frank. “

Already in 2020, JK Rowling assured that she would not forgive ” Never “ In Watson, Radcliffe and other actors in the saga of having stored on the side of a movement that she accuses of wanting “Destroy the harmful rights of women “. The rupture seems total. However, Emma Watson assures in this podcast still want to pick up the songs with the designer: “Yes, always. I believe it. I believe it completely.“Not sure that this desire is shared.